- #When was primavera p3 launched full
- #When was primavera p3 launched software
- #When was primavera p3 launched free
There were 28 other CPM programs that respondents reported using, including 11 listed on the survey, but none with more than 6.8 percent experience rating. Software applications used range from programs that run on a mini-computer to home-grown software. Note: multiple answers were allowed, and certainly many P6 users are also current or former P3 users. Clearly, Oracle’s Primavera and SureTrak products are the dominant applications out there. Our next or follow-up survey will attempt to find out what people prefer and/or use exclusively.
#When was primavera p3 launched software
It was interesting to learn that at least three people use it for building information modeling (BIM) purposes, and several others use CPM during the design and engineering phase.ĬPM Software – Which Program(s) Are Used? And The Winner Is…Įighty-five percent of survey respondents said they had experience with CPM software. Of this group, Microsoft Project, at 81.2 percent, is the software most respondents have used. Close behind are Primavera P6 at 70.9 percent, Primavera P3 at 67.8 percent, Primavera SureTrak at 58.1 percent, and Primavera Contractor at 22.5 percent.
One of the key reasons for the survey is to find out why people use CPM software in the first place. We are taught that use of CPM software is an important tool for successfully managing projects. However, only 53 percent of respondents use it for actively managing projects. The bulk of the remaining group use CPM software because the owner requires it, for either payment, reporting and/or claims support.
#When was primavera p3 launched full
The remaining 21 percent was a mix of job functions including academics, estimators, and executives. The full survey report lists these titles in details. As shown later in the survey, most respondents do use schedules, and coupled with the number of those who do not consider themselves as “schedule professionals” underlies the importance of scheduling to the construction process.Īs a group, 68 percent of our respondents said they have used CPM software for 10 years a more - a very experienced group indeed. Less than 9 percent have never used CPM software, and 21 percent have used CPM between 1 and 10 years. Of the 34 respondents who do not use CPM software, only 14 people said they use the output produced by CPM software, such as bar charts, network diagrams, or reports. Approximate 42 percent placed themselves as project professionals, including project engineer, project manager, project controls engineer, project controls manager, superintendent or construction manager.
Twenty-seven percent of the respondents described themselves as schedule professionals - scheduler, schedule engineer, schedule manager, or schedule consultant. The balance of respondents represents engineers, academics, trainers, software vendors, and one attorney. If we assume half the consultants work for owners and the other half work for contractors, we are left with approximately 75 percent of respondents on the construction side and 25 percent on the owner side.Ī good cross-section of industries is represented, with commercial construction at 48 percent of respondents being the largest segment and energy the lowest at 23 percent. We were probably remiss in omitting healthcare and residential construction, but we did get several write-ins for each. The third group, at 11 percent, consists of public and private owners. The second largest group of users, at 26 percent, is consultants: project controls, project management and claims consultants.
#When was primavera p3 launched free
The complete research report will be available in the bookstore later this month and be accessible to ConstructionPro Network members free of charge.Īlmost half of the respondents represent the contractor-side of the construction community and include contractors, sub/trade contractors, and construction managers. With more than 400 responses, we believe we have gathered a representative sampling of the construction industry to meet the objectives of this survey. We especially wanted to find out who is using Critical Path Method (CPM) scheduling, how and why they are using it, and whether users' needs are being met by the current state-of-the-art CPM software. Last month, WPL Publishing launched a survey to better gauge the extent to which computer-generated schedules are being used in construction projects and the types of software being used to create the schedules.
0 kommentar(er)
